WASHINGTON*, October 4, 2013 ---
http://ec.tynt.com/b/rw?id=bFUy1y59er4B9Macwqm_6l&u=wtcommunities
We can learn from what Desiree M of Louisiana posted, addressing the multitude who complain about Obamacare's website: "To everyone having - problems, maybe God is trying to stop you from making a huge mistake."
Not only is Obamacare unpopular with the general public, but it also is losing 
  favor among the very people it's supposed to help. The White 
  House has difficulty getting the uninsured to buy Obamacare not merely because 
  the government website is bad, but mostly because the product is 
  bad. It's overpriced.
The Affordable Care Act long ago became known as Obamacare. Now it's time to re-christen it the Un-Affordable Care Act.
Conservatives should insist that the Obama Administration immediately make 
  public all details about the signups and traffic at the key 
  website, www.healthcare.gov., and Congress should act promptly on that information.
The White House cannot brag about how many have signed up for coverage, so 
  they brag about visits to the site. That's like a store boasting how 
  many people looked through the windows but never went inside to buy.
Many visitors to the Obamacame website complain because it freezes up before 
  they can even find out the prices of policies. They are the lucky 
  ones.
Once they finally find out the costs, they back off from applying. High premiums are accompanied by high deductibles and high co-pays.
The Administration insists millions will enroll by year's end, but it's a mystery 
  how many have applied so far. Reporters beg the public for 
  information. "The Chicago Tribune" deemed it newsworthy when they 
  finally found a lone individual who enrolled. Upon learning that 
  57-year-old Kathy Kanak signed up on the second day, it was printed as proof 
  that at least one real live Illinoisan had made it through the 
  online maze and applied. Kanak said her willingness to pay the high price was 
  linked to the subsidy she expects to help cover the bill.
In the absence of official figures, media make estimates. London's "Daily 
  Mail" reported that less than 1% of the first day's website 
  visitors actually signed up. They estimated only .058% of California visitors 
  had done so, .059% of Connecticut';s and .032% of New York's.
Kansas Congressman Tim Huelskamp said his state was shut out. Although an estimated 
  365,000 Kansans lack insurance, zero individuals reportedly 
  signed up on day one. In Louisiana, only after the second day did Blue Cross-Blue 
  Shield get word that it had new customers---a whopping seven 
  of them in the whole state.
Nobody knows how much the fault stems from the lousy computer system and how 
  much from the lousy prices. Premiums are soaring because the law 
  dictates so many expanded benefits and so much bureaucracy.
As the Manhattan Institute calculated, Obamacare increases individual-market 
  premiums by 99% for men and 62% for women. The worst 
  prices hit young adults. The American Action Forum says a healthy 30-year-old 
  male will see the cheapest option rise 260% on average. 
  Premiums would increase in every state. In Vermont, it will rise 600% in Vermont.
The same mandates also bring dramatic premium increases for group plans. So 
  who does get lower premiums? Mostly those with pre-existing 
  conditions, which is a major factor in shifting the cost increases onto everyone 
  else.
The facts are dawning on people as they learn the truths about Obamacare, like 
  when they find out how ultra-expensive it will be for 
  them on top of the costs to taxpayers in general. It is a far cry from Obama's 
  cynical promises to cut insurance costs by $2,500 a year for a 
  family of four.
High prices, high deductibles and high co-pays are generating high disgust.
The start of registration has opened eyes. The official website has a companion 
  official Facebook page. From its visitors we learn what's 
  being said by those who visit the official website. There on Facebook, the complaints 
  focus on two things:
1---The website is lousy, and
2---So are the prices for Obamacare
"I am so disappointed," comments Leslie S. from Georgia. "These 
  prices are outrageous and there are huge deductibles. No one can afford this!" 
  
  333 people "liked" her comment.
Tammy B. of Ohio wonders, "How is it that Facebook ... can reliably handle 
  BILLIONS of electronic interactions per second, but the 
  Healthcare.gov site, which is literally the very heart of the Obamacare program, 
  wasn't ready for the obvious millions of visitors." 109 people 
  "liked" her comment.
Florida's Mary J. complains that premium subsidies for low earners doesn't 
  counteract how Obamacare reduces income, "...Businesses and 
  companies ... knock everyone to part time to avoid penalties of ACA. More people 
  would be working if it weren't for the fact that the welfare 
  system pays out more than a full time job. ... we are going to be taxed and 
  have to pay for some one else's health care." 145 people "liked" 
  her 
  comment.
Alabama's James A commented, "I will have a choice.....I can pay my rent 
  and buy groceries, or I can pay the health care premiums, move out into 
  the streets and live under a bridge somewhere, and go hungry! Can I please get 
  one of those exemption things that the President and Congress 
  got?" 60 people "liked" what James said.
Meantime the White House feigns that it doesn't know how the web applications 
  are going. That's a remarkable statement from a group that 
  mastered Internet technology in two successful elections. After all, it's routine 
  today for even non-techies to monitor visitors, traffic and 
  sales in real-time, with non-stop detailed reports.
Most likely, the White House has put out the word to conceal bad news and let 
  the President's people spin a cover story. As they've done in 
  other controversies, they'll conceal the embarrassing truth as long as they 
  can, hoping that meantime Obamacare will become locked-in for 
  perpetuity.
If Obamacare were the great product that Obama claims, it would outsell Ginsu 
  Knives, Sham-Wow!, George Foreman Grilles and every other product 
  that's hawked by pitchmen. The site would be slicker than eBay's, Amazon's, 
  esurance, and all others that deal in high-volume sales.
Obama told the country, "Just visit healthcare.gov, and there you can 
  compare insurance plans -- side by side -- the same way you'd shop for a 
  plane ticket on Kayak or a TV on Amazon."
Not exactly, Mr. President. Those websites work well and offer quality goods 
  at affordable prices. That is quite unlike people's experience 
  with Obamacare.
We can learn from what Desiree M of Louisiana posted, addressing the multitude 
  who complain about Obamacare's website: "To everyone having 
  problems, maybe God is trying to stop you from making a huge mistake."
114 echoed her words with a "like."